Re: ETXTBSY window in __fput

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 10:22:14AM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > Egads...  Let me get it straight - you have a bunch of threads sharing descriptor
> > tables and some of them are forking (or cloning without shared descriptor tables)
> > while that is going on?
> 
> I suppose if they could start a new process in a more straightforward manner,
> they would. But you cannot start a new process without fork. Anyway, I'm but
> a messenger here: the problem has been hit by various people in the Go community
> (and by Go team itself, at least twice). Here I'm asking about a potential
> shortcoming in __fput that exacerbates the problem.

I'm assuming that the problem is showing up in real life when users
run a go problem using "go run" where the golang compiler freshly
writes the executable, and then fork/exec's the binary.  And using
multiple threads sharing descriptor tables was just to make a reliable
reproducer?

						- Ted




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux