Re: [PATCH 1/7] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 at 02:50, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Fix this by only using synchronous fputs for fuseblk servers if the
> > process doesn't have PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE.  Hopefully the fuseblk server
> > had the good sense to call PR_SET_IO_FLUSHER to mark itself as a
> > filesystem server.
> 
> I'm still not convinced.   This patch adds complexity and depends on
> the server doing some magic, which makes it unreliable.
> 
> Doing it async unconditionally removes complexity and fixes the issue reliably.

Works for me, I'll make it use async mode unconditionally.

--D

> Thanks,
> Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux