On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 1:05 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03.09.25 22:02, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:48:41PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> On 30.08.25 01:39, Joanne Koong wrote: > >>> Add an additional arg to __folio_start_writeback() that takes in the > >>> number of pages to write back. > >> > >> Usually we pass something like page+nr_pages so we know the actual range. I > >> assume here this is not required, because we only care about using the > >> #pages for accounting purposes, right? > > > > I think all the "nr_pages" here are actually the number of dirty pages > > in the folio, right? Or so I gather since later patches have iomap > > walking bitmaps to find all the set/clear bits. Perhaps that parameter > > ought to be called nr_dirty(_pages)? > > That would make perfect sense to me :) I will rename this to nr_dirty_pages to make this more clear / less confusing. Thanks, Joanne > > -- > Cheers > > David / dhildenb >
