Re: [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:07:54 +0200
Cc: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250902145428.456510-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>

> For the life of me I could not figure out if write_inode_now() is legal
> to call in ->evict_inode later and have no means to test, so I devised a

Welcome to our meticulously documented and simultaneously
self-explanatory codebase.

References:
- [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE
  - From: Mateusz Guzik

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] procfs: make reference pidns more user-visible
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: add an enum for number of life time hints
Previous by thread: [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE
Next by thread: Re: [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux