Re: [PATCH 08/16] mm: add remap_pfn_range_prepare(), remap_pfn_range_complete()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 02:27:12PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

> It's not only remap that is a concern here, people do all kinds of weird
> and wonderful things in .mmap(), sometimes in combination with remap.

So it should really not be split this way, complete is a badly name
prepopulate and it should only fill the PTEs, which shouldn't need
more locking.

The only example in this series didn't actually need to hold the lock.

Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux