Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:16:17 -0700
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <8957c526-d05c-4c0d-bfed-0eb6e6d2476c@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:51:18AM +0530, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
> Greetings!!!
> 
> 
> IBM CI has reported a kernel crash, while running generic/256 test case on
> pmem device from xfstests suite on linux-next20250911 kernel.

Given that this in memcg code you probably want to send this to linux-mm
and the cgroups list.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
  - From: Venkat

References:
- [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
  - From: Venkat Rao Bagalkote

Prev by Date: [PATCH] initramfs: Use struct_size() helper to improve dir_add()
Next by Date: Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
Previous by thread: Re: [External] Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
Next by thread: Re: [linux-next20250911]Kernel OOPs while running generic/256 on Pmem device
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]