Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock critical sections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/25 2:50 AM, pengdonglin wrote:
From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xxxxxxxxxx>

When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is disabled, spin_lock*() operations implicitly
disable preemption, which provides RCU read-side protection. When
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled, spin_lock*() implementations internally
manage RCU read-side critical sections.

I have some doubt about your claim that disabling preemption provides RCU read-side protection. It is true for some flavors but probably not all. I do know that disabling interrupt will provide RCU read-side protection. So for spin_lock_irq*() calls, that is valid. I am not sure about spin_lock_bh(), maybe it applies there too. we need some RCU people to confirm.

When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled, rt_spin_lock/unlock() will call rcu_read_lock/_unlock() internally. So eliminating explicit rcu_read_lock/unlock() in critical sections should be fine.

Cheers,
Longman





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux