Re: [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument
From: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 21:25:52 +0300
Cc: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250825044355.1541941-46-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Please, drop this patch.

I plan to inline path_umount into the only caller in
v2 version of my initrd removal patchset
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250913003842.41944-1-safinaskar@xxxxxxxxx/
.

(path_umount is called in one place only
after initrd is removed.)

-- 
Askar Safin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument
  - From: Al Viro

References:
- [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] initrd: Remove unused parameter 'pos' from identify_ramdisk_image()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] allow partial folio write with iomap_folio_state
Previous by thread: [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 46/52] path_umount(): constify struct path argument
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux