On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:54:21PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:45:48PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:38:26PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:31:53PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > If you're interested, is it time to do some spec quoting and language > > > > lawyering? > > > > > > If you want to start or restart a thread on the block list specificaly > > > for that topic, then sure, happy to spec talk with you. But I don't want > > > to chat on this one. I just wanted to know what you were talking about > > > because the description seemed underhanded. > > > > Not underhanded, just straightforward - I've seen the test data, and the > > spec seemed pretty clear to me... > > "the block layer developer who went on a four email rant where he, > charitably, misread the spec or the patchset or both" > > Please revisit the thread and let me know me if you still stand by that > description. I've no idea if you're talking about me or one of the other > block developers on it, but I frankly don't see anything resembling what > you're describing. Well, since you asked, Christoph... I want to say - no hard feelings, things being frosty between us goes way back, and we've recently made efforts to work better together. But that was pretty hard to respond to.
