Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> The kernel has thrived for over 30 years not just because of technical
> excellence, but because it has (mostly) maintained a collaborative
> environment where developers can work together despite disagreements.
> That collaborative environment IS doing right by users.
> 
Come on? It's been around for 30 years because it's financially beneficial for 
some players. Should we forget about the letters and insults that flew around 
before 2018? The Code of Conduct wasn't introduced just like that. Well, 
that's just a small remark, in general. The fact is, there are no objections 
to the technical quality of Bcachefs. The objections are exclusively about 
Kent's personality and how he conducts his affairs. Maybe someone experienced 
in resolving such issues and handling personnel conflicts could suggest a 
solution? Analyze the situation and offer methods for resolution? Especially 
since the problem is far from being solely about Kent. I suggest that instead 
of threats, hasty conclusions, and quick decisions, we turn to professionals 
with the right expertise, who are surely present in the Linux Foundation. It 
will take time, but it will help everyone become better. I hope everyone 
understands that the right solution shouldn't be dictated by someone's 
feelings or grudges—regardless of who's involved.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux