Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] add persistent huge zero folio support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 11:07:48AM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
>
> Well, my worry is that 2M can be a high tax for smaller machines.
> Compile-time might be cleaner, but it has downsides.
>
> It is also not clear if these users actually need physical HZP or virtual
> is enough. Virtual is cheap.

The kernel config flag (default =N) literally says don't use unless you
have plenty of memory :)

So this isn't an issue.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux