Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: add persistent huge zero folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is much nicer and now _super_ simple, I like it.

Thanks to you and David :)

> 
> A few nits below but generally:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.
> 
> > ---
> >  include/linux/huge_mm.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/Kconfig              | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/huge_memory.c        | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> >  static inline int split_folio_to_list_to_order(struct folio *folio,
> > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> > index e443fe8cd6cf..fbe86ef97fd0 100644
> > --- a/mm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> > @@ -823,6 +823,22 @@ config ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB
> >  config ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP
> >  	def_bool n
> >
> > +config PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO
> > +	bool "Allocate a PMD sized folio for zeroing"
> > +	depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> 
> I feel like we really need to sort out what is/isn't predicated on THP... it
> seems like THP is sort of short hand for 'any large folio stuff' but not
> always...
> 
> But this is a more general point :)

I already brought this topic once during THP cabal. I am thinking of
submitting a talk about this topic for LPC Memory Management MC.

> 
> > +	help
> > +	  Enable this option to reduce the runtime refcounting overhead
> > +	  of the huge zero folio and expand the places in the kernel
> > +	  that can use huge zero folios. This can potentially improve
> > +	  the performance while performing an I/O.
> 
> NIT: I think we can drop 'an', and probably refactor this sentence to something
> like 'For instance, block I/O benefits from access to large folios for zeroing
> memory'.
> 
> > +
> > +	  With this option enabled, the huge zero folio is allocated
> > +	  once and never freed. One full huge page worth of memory shall
> > +	  be used.
> 
> NIT: huge page worth -> huge page's worth
> 

Thanks for the comments. I will make those changes and send a new
version.

--
Pankaj




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux