Hi Gerhard, hi. Gerhard Wiesinger - 10.08.25, 08:20:43 CEST: > On 28.07.2025 17:14, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > Schedule notes for users: > > > > I've been digging through the bug tracker and polling users to see > > what bugs are still outstanding, and - it's not much. > > > > So, the experimental label is coming off in 6.18. > > > > As always, if you do hit a bug, please report it. > > I can now confirm that bcachefs is getting stable and the test cases > with intentionally data corruption (simulation of a real world case I > had) gets bcachefs back to a consistent state (after 2 runs of: bcachefs > fsck -f -y ${DEV}). That's a base requirement for a stable filesystem. > Version of bcachefs-tools is git > 530e8ade4e6af7d152f4f79bf9f2b9dec6441f2b and kernel is > 6.16.0-200.fc42.x86_64. > > See for details, I made data corruption even worser with running the > destroy script 5x: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/aa613c37-153c-43e4-b68e-9d50744be > 7de@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Great work Kent and the other contributors. > > Unfortunately btrfs can't be repaired to a consistent state with the > same testcase. I'd like to be that testcase fixed also for BTRFS as a > stable filesystem (versions: 6.16.0-200.fc42.x86_64, btrfs-progs v6.15, > -EXPERIMENTAL -INJECT -STATIC +LZO +ZSTD +UDEV +FSVERITY +ZONED > CRYPTO=libgcrypt). > > (I reported that already far in the past on the mailing list, see here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/63f8866f-ceda-4228-b595-e37b016e7b1f > @wiesinger.com/). Thanks for this great find and these test results. On a technical perspective I still think the Linux kernel is a better kernel with BCacheFS included. And write this without having had any issues – except for bad performance especially on hard disks, but partly also on flash – with BTRFS. And I use it on a couple laptops, some virtual machines and a lot of external disks. But not on a multi device setup. I had a BTRFS RAID 1 for a long time. This also has been stable since kernel 4.6 up to the time I still used it. So I did not really have much of a need to fsck BTRFS. Best, -- Martin