Hi David,
On 08/06, David Howells wrote:
...
static int
-receive_encrypted_read(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_message **smb,
+receive_encrypted_read(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_message **mid,
int *num_mids)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return -ENOANO; // TODO
+#if 0
char *buf = server->smallbuf;
struct smb2_transform_hdr *tr_hdr = (struct smb2_transform_hdr *)buf;
struct iov_iter iter;
@@ -4753,8 +4758,8 @@ receive_encrypted_read(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_message **smb,
dw->server = server;
*num_mids = 1;
- len = min_t(unsigned int, buflen, server->vals->read_rsp_size +
- sizeof(struct smb2_transform_hdr)) - HEADER_SIZE(server) + 1;
+ len = umin(buflen, server->vals->read_rsp_size +
+ sizeof(struct smb2_transform_hdr)) - HEADER_SIZE(server) + 1;
rc = cifs_read_from_socket(server, buf + HEADER_SIZE(server) - 1, len);
if (rc < 0)
@@ -4836,6 +4841,7 @@ receive_encrypted_read(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_message **smb,
discard_data:
cifs_discard_remaining_data(server);
goto free_pages;
+#endif
}
I don't quite get why this was commented out (and also seems unrelated
to patch subject).
What problems did you have here? Does it not work?
