Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] freezer: Introduce freeze priority model to address process dependency issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/08, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
>
> 在 2025/8/7 21:25, Michal Hocko 写道:
> >If they are running in the userspace and e.g. sleeping while not
> >TASK_FREEZABLE then priority simply makes no difference. And if they are
> >TASK_FREEZABLE then the priority doens't matter either.
> >
> >What am I missing?

I too do not understand how can this series improve the freezer.

> under ideal conditions, if a userspace task is TASK_FREEZABLE, receives the
> freezing() signal, and enters the refrigerator in a timely manner,

Note that __freeze_task() won't even send a signal to a sleeping
TASK_FREEZABLE task, __freeze_task() will just change its state to
TASK_FROZEN.

Oleg.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux