Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 23:03:14 -0400
Cc: <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250805141123.332298-1-kbusch@meta.com> (Keith Busch's message of "Tue, 5 Aug 2025 07:11:16 -0700")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Keith,

> This series removes the direct io requirement that io vector lengths
> align to the logical block size.

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

References:
- [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors
  - From: Keith Busch

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: always return zero on success from replace_fd()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing
Previous by thread: [PATCHv2 5/7] block: remove bdev_iter_is_aligned
Next by thread: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux