Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: add static huge zero folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks a lot Lorenzo and David for the feedback and quick iteration on
the patchset. I really like the number of lines of code has been
steadily reducing since the first version :)

I will fold the changes in the next series.

<snip>
> > > @@ -866,9 +866,14 @@ static int __init thp_shrinker_init(void)
> > >   	huge_zero_folio_shrinker->scan_objects = shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan;
> > >   	shrinker_register(huge_zero_folio_shrinker);
> > > -	deferred_split_shrinker->count_objects = deferred_split_count;
> > > -	deferred_split_shrinker->scan_objects = deferred_split_scan;
> > > -	shrinker_register(deferred_split_shrinker);
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO)) {
> > > +		if (!get_huge_zero_folio())
> > > +			pr_warn("Allocating static huge zero folio failed\n");
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		deferred_split_shrinker->count_objects = deferred_split_count;
> > > +		deferred_split_shrinker->scan_objects = deferred_split_scan;
> > > +		shrinker_register(deferred_split_shrinker);
> > > +	}
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > > --
> > > 2.50.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Now, one thing I do not like is that we have "ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO" but
> > > then have a user-selectable option.
> > > 
> > > Should we just get rid of ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO?
> > 

One of the early feedbacks from Lorenzo was that there might be some
architectures that has PMD size > 2M might enable this by mistake. So
the ARCH_WANTS_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO was introduced as an extra
precaution apart from user selectable CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO.

Isn't it better to have an extra knob per-arch to be on the safer side
or you think it is too excessive?

> > Yeah, though I guess we probably need to make it need CONFIG_MMU if so?
> > Probably don't want to provide it if it might somehow break things?
> 
> It would still depend on THP, and THP is !MMU. So that should just work.
> 
> We could go one step further and special case in mm_get_huge_zero_folio() +
> mm_put_huge_zero_folio() on CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO.
> 
> Something like
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 9c38a95e9f091..9b87884e5f299 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ static void put_huge_zero_page(void)
> 
>  struct folio *mm_get_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO))
> +               return huge_zero_folio;
> +
>         if (test_bit(MMF_HUGE_ZERO_PAGE, &mm->flags))
>                 return READ_ONCE(huge_zero_folio);
> 
> @@ -262,6 +265,9 @@ struct folio *mm_get_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct
> *mm)
> 
>  void mm_put_huge_zero_folio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO))
> +               return huge_zero_folio;
> +
>         if (test_bit(MMF_HUGE_ZERO_PAGE, &mm->flags))
>                 put_huge_zero_page();
>  }
> 
> 
--
Pankaj




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux