On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 08:54:00AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 8/2/25 01:47, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +static int bio_align_to_lbs(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> > +{
> > + struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;
> > + size_t nbytes;
> > +
> > + if (!bdev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + nbytes = bio->bi_iter.bi_size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1);
> > + if (!nbytes)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + bio_revert(bio, nbytes);
> > + iov_iter_revert(iter, nbytes);
> > + if (!bio->bi_iter.bi_size)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * bio_iov_iter_get_pages - add user or kernel pages to a bio
> > * @bio: bio to add pages to
> > @@ -1336,6 +1355,7 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> > ret = __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
> > } while (!ret && iov_iter_count(iter) && !bio_full(bio, 0));
> > + ret = bio_align_to_lbs(bio, iter);
> > return bio->bi_vcnt ? 0 : ret;
>
> Wouldn't that cause the error from bio_align_to_lba() to be ignored
> if bio->bi_vcnt is greater than 0?
That returns an error only if the alignment reduces the size to 0, so
there would be a bug somewhere if bi_vcnt is not also 0 in that case.
