On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 09:56:16PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > Also a bit surprising to see all your lowlevel work and then fuse high > > > level coming ;) > > > > Right now fuse2fs is a high level fuse server, so I hacked whatever I > > needed into fuse.c to make it sort of work, awkwardly. That stuff > > doesn't need to live forever. > > > > In the long run, the lowlevel server will probably have better > > performance because fuse2fs++ can pass ext2 inode numbers to the kernel > > as the nodeids, and libext2fs can look up inodes via nodeid. No more > > path construction overhead! > > > > I was wondering how well an LLM would be in the mechanical task of > converting fuse2fs to a low level fuse fs, so I was tempted to try. > > Feel free to use it or lose it or use as a reference, because at least > for basic testing it seems to works: > https://github.com/amir73il/e2fsprogs/commits/fuse4fs/ Heh, I'll take a closer look in the morning, but it looks like a reasonable conversion. Are you willing to add a "Co-developed-by" tag per Sasha's recent proposal[1] if I pull it in? --D [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250727195802.2222764-1-sashal@xxxxxxxxxx/ > Thanks, > Amir. >
