fuse io_uring test performance is not good when fio iodepth > 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Guys,

Sorry for the interruption.
I integrated fuse over io_uring patches in v6.14, but I found a
strange problem when I tested the libfuse null-fs test case.
the fio commands as below,
1) fio -direct=1 --filename=/mnt/singfile --rw=read  -iodepth=1
--ioengine=libaio --bs=4k --size=4G --runtime=60 --numjobs=1
-name=test_fuse2
the performance result:
enable fuse > default fuse
2) fio -direct=1 --filename=/mnt/singfile --rw=read  -iodepth=16
--ioengine=libaio --bs=4k --size=4G --runtime=60 --numjobs=1
-name=test_fuse2
the performance result:
enable fuse < default fuse
3) fio -direct=1 --filename=/mnt/singfile --rw=read  -iodepth=1
--ioengine=libaio --bs=4k --size=4G --runtime=60 --numjobs=16
-name=test_fuse2
 the performance result:
enable fuse > default fuse

Why is fio test performance worse when enable io_uring with fio
-iodepth option > 1?  it looks fuse over io_uring feature does not
handle this case like the default fuse configuration.

Thanks
Gang




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux