Re: [PATCH v1 03/32] kho: warn if KHO is disabled due to an error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:57 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/25/25 4:17 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > During boot scratch area is allocated based on command line
> > parameters or auto calculated. However, scratch area may fail
> > to allocate, and in that case KHO is disabled. Currently,
> > no warning is printed that KHO is disabled, which makes it
> > confusing for the end user to figure out why KHO is not
> > available. Add the missing warning message.
>
> Are users even going to know what "KHO" means in the warning message?

Changed warning to: Failed to reserve scratch area, disabling kexec handover

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kexec_handover.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> > index 1ff6b242f98c..069d5890841c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> > @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static void __init kho_reserve_scratch(void)
> >  err_free_scratch_desc:
> >       memblock_free(kho_scratch, kho_scratch_cnt * sizeof(*kho_scratch));
> >  err_disable_kho:
> > +     pr_warn("Failed to reserve scratch area, disabling KHO\n");
> >       kho_enable = false;
> >  }
> >
>
> --
> ~Randy
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux