On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 09:27:21PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 18373de980f2..f27d57aea316 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1197,6 +1197,10 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
> __u32 i_csum_seed;
>
> kprojid_t i_projid;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> + struct fscrypt_inode_info *i_fscrypt_info;
> +#endif
Did you consider keeping the name as i_crypt_info instead of changing it
to i_fscrypt_info? The rationale for i_crypt_info in the first place is
that it's filesystem code, so fs is implied.
I see you also had to replace i_crypt_info with i_fscrypt_info in a
bunch of comments. It might make more sense to rephrase those to not
refer to the exact field name. E.g. instead of "Set up
->i_fscrypt_info", we could write "Set up the inode's fscrypt info".
- Eric
