Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:45:05 -0700
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg@xxxxxxx>, vbabka@xxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx, paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, pvorel@xxxxxxx, bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx, tabba@xxxxxxxxxx, vannapurve@xxxxxxxxxx, chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx, bharata@xxxxxxx, nikunj@xxxxxxx, michael.day@xxxxxxx, shdhiman@xxxxxxx, yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx, Neeraj.Upadhyay@xxxxxxx, thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx, michael.roth@xxxxxxx, aik@xxxxxxx, jgg@xxxxxxxxxx, kalyazin@xxxxxxxxxx, peterx@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, roypat@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ziy@xxxxxxxxxx, matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx, joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx, rakie.kim@xxxxxx, byungchul@xxxxxx, gourry@xxxxxxxxxx, kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, apopple@xxxxxxxxxx, chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxx, amit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx, ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx, gshan@xxxxxxxxxx, jgowans@xxxxxxxxxx, pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx, papaluri@xxxxxxx, yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx, suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx, quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx, aneeshkumar.kizhakeveetil@xxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-coco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <bdce1a12-ab73-4de1-892b-f8e849a8ab51@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Just to clarify: this is based on Fuad's stage 1 and should probably still be
> tagged "RFC" until stage-1 is finally upstream.
> 
> (I was hoping stage-1 would go upstream in 6.17, but I am not sure yet if that is
> still feasible looking at the never-ending review)

6.17 is very doable.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
  - From: David Hildenbrand

References:
- [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
  - From: Shivank Garg
- Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
  - From: David Hildenbrand

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] fanotify: add support for a variable length permission event
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]