On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 09:04:14AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > If done properly, fixing this would be great. I've tried to minimize > the overhead of CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and CONFIG_FS_VERITY when those > features are not actually being used at runtime. The struct inode > fields are the main case where we still don't do a good job at that. Can you take a look if my idea of not allocating the verity data for all inodes but just those where verity is enabled and then looking that up using a rhashtable makes any sense?
