On 7/18/25 20:22, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 04:16:28PM +0000, Bernd Schubert wrote: >> On 7/18/25 01:38, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >>> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Add the library methods so that fuse servers can manage an in-kernel >>> iomap cache. This enables better performance on small IOs and is >>> required if the filesystem needs synchronization between pagecache >>> writes and writeback. >> >> Sorry, if this ready to be merged? I don't see in linux master? Or part >> of your other patches (will take some to go through these). > > No, everything you see in here is all RFC status and not for merging. > We're past -rc6, it's far too late to be trying to get anything new > merged in the kernel. > > Though I say that as a former iomap maintainer who wouldn't take big > core code changes after -rc4 or XFS changes after -rc6. I think I was > much more conservative about that than most maintainers. :) > > (The cover letter yells very loudly about do not merge any of this, > btw.) This is [PATCH 1/1] and when I wrote the mail it was not sorted in threaded form - I didn't see a cover letter for this specific patch. Might also be because some mails go to my ddn address and some to my own one. I use the DDN address for patches to give DDN credits for the work, but fastmail provides so much better filtering - I prefer my private address for CCs. So asked because I was confused about this [1/1] - it made it look like it is ready. Thanks, Bernd
