On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 20:35 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:32:46AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > +++ b/fs/hfs/inode.c > > @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static bool hfs_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t mask) > > tree = HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree; > > break; > > default: > > - BUG(); > > + pr_err("detected unknown inode %lu, running fsck.hfs is recommended.\n", > > + inode->i_ino); > > As I asked the first time, how can we get here? In order to release a > folio, we have to first populate the pagecache of the inode with folios. > How did we manage to do that for an inode with a bogus i_ino? > Probably, we have not checked the inode ID at first place in hfs_read_inode() [1]. So, it makes sense to rework the logic here. > > @@ -441,7 +442,8 @@ int hfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc) > > hfs_btree_write(HFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->cat_tree); > > return 0; > > default: > > - BUG(); > > + pr_err("detected unknown inode %lu, running fsck.hfs is recommended.\n", > > + inode->i_ino); > > Similarly here, how did we manage to mark a bad inode as dirty? I assume if we created the inode as normal with i_ino == 0, then we can make it as a dirty. Because, inode will be made as bad inode here [2] only if rec->type is invalid. But if it is valid, then we can create the normal inode even with i_ino == 0. It is my current understanding of the situation here. Tetsuo, please, correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Slava. [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc6/source/fs/hfs/inode.c#L350 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc6/source/fs/hfs/inode.c#L373