On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 03:02:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > will be harder, we have to get to 604 bytes. Although for my system if > > we could get xfs_inode down from 1024 bytes to 992, that'd save me much > > more memory ;-) > > There's some relatively low hanging fruit there. > > One would be to make the VFS inode i_ino a u64 finally so that XFS > and other modern files systems an stop having their own duplicate of That's already on my TODO since we discussed this with Jeff last year.
