On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 3:40 AM Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 12:04:25PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 16.07.25 05:05, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > Extend /proc/pid/maps tearing test to verify PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl operation > > > correctness while the vma is being concurrently modified. > > > > > > > Wonder if that should be moved out of this series as well. Of course, it > > doesn't hurt to have this test already in. > > Yeah that's move this out actually, in this series it's not actually > testing anything _pertinent_. > > Though all the tests are designed to pass _before_ as well as after > obviously, so (as David says) no harm to have it here BUT - it's confusing > and a bit weird :P > > So yeah let's just move this test over to the respun procmap query series. Ok. > > BTW Suren - slightly unrelated but - the syzbot report I did the analysis > on is super super reproducable, so if you want to play around with > different solutions, using that should make it some quick iterations. Yes, I'm using that test routinely now. > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > David / dhildenb > > > > Cheers, Lorenzo
