On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 10:39:57AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Let's take kernel_execve() as example, there is no way around using this > function in one way or another. It only has two existing callers. > init/main.c: It is completely unsuitable for this usecase. > kernel/umh.c: It is also what Al suggested and I am all for it. > Unfortunately it is missing features. Citation from my response to Al: But why does the code that calls it need to be modular? I get why the actual test cases should be modular, but the core test runner is small and needs a lot of kernel internals. Just require it to be built-in and all this mess goes away. That being said some of this stuff, like get_fs_type / put_filesystem or replace_fd seem like the wrong level of abstractions for something running tests anyway.