On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:14:38AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 06:18:43PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > [into #fixes, unless somebody objects] > > > > Lifetime of new_dn_mark is controlled by that of its ->fsn_mark, > > pointed to by new_fsn_mark. Unfortunately, a failure exit had > > been inserted between the allocation of new_dn_mark and the > > call of fsnotify_init_mark(), ending up with a leak. > > > > Fixes: 1934b212615d "file: reclaim 24 bytes from f_owner" > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > I'll grab this into vfs.fixes and send it with the batch I have in > there this week. OK... Again, the only things I've got in the vicinity are post-rc1 fodder, so I've no preferences re which branch does that go through.
