Re: [PATCH] readahead: Use folio_nr_pages() instead of shift operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 10:23:32 +0800 Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2025/7/12 00:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 10.07.25 08:04, Chi Zhiling wrote:
> >> From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> folio_nr_pages() is faster helper function to get the number of pages
> >> when NR_PAGES_IN_LARGE_FOLIO is enabled.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   mm/readahead.c | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> >> index 95a24f12d1e7..406756d34309 100644
> >> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> >> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> >> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void page_cache_async_ra(struct readahead_control 
> >> *ractl,
> >>        * Ramp up sizes, and push forward the readahead window.
> >>        */
> >>       expected = round_down(ra->start + ra->size - ra->async_size,
> >> -            1UL << folio_order(folio));
> >> +            folio_nr_pages(folio));
> >>       if (index == expected) {
> >>           ra->start += ra->size;
> >>           /*
> > 
> > This should probably get squashed in Ryans commit?
> 
> I have no objection, it's up to Ryan.

"Ryans commit" is now c4602f9fa77f ("mm/readahead: store folio order in
struct file_ra_state") in mm-stable.  I'd prefer not to rebase for this!








[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux