Re: [PATCH RFC 01/14] mm/memory: drop highest_memmap_pfn sanity check in vm_normal_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11.07.25 20:49, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 08.07.25 04:52, Hugh Dickins wrote:

Of course it's limited in what it can catch (and won't even get called
if the present bit was not set - a more complete patch might unify with
those various "Bad swap" messages). Of course. But it's still useful for
stopping pfn_to_page() veering off the end of the memmap[] (in some
configs).

Right, probably in the configs we both don't care that much about nowadays :)

I thought it was the other way round: it's useful for stopping
pfn_to_page() veering off the end of the memmap[] if it's a memory model
where pfn_to_page() is a simple linear conversion.

As with SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, which I thought was the favourite nowadays.

Yes, you're right, I had the !SPARSEMEM model in mind, but obviously, the same applies for the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP case as well.

Only the SPARSEMEM && !SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP model is weird. IIRC, it will dereference NULL when given a non-existant PFN. (__nr_to_section returning NULL and pfn_to_section_nr() not beeing happy about that)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux