On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:00:48AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> + switch (_IOC_NR(cmd)) {
> + case _IOC_NR(FS_IOC_GETLBMD_CAP):
> + if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) != _IOC_DIR(FS_IOC_GETLBMD_CAP))
> + break;
> + if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != _IOC_TYPE(FS_IOC_GETLBMD_CAP))
> + break;
> + if (_IOC_NR(cmd) != _IOC_NR(FS_IOC_GETLBMD_CAP))
> + break;
> + if (_IOC_SIZE(cmd) < LBMD_SIZE_VER0)
> + break;
> + if (_IOC_SIZE(cmd) > PAGE_SIZE)
> + break;
> + return blk_get_meta_cap(bdev, cmd, argp);
> + }
Yikes. I really don't get why we're trying change the way how ioctls
worked forever. We can and usually do use the size based macro already.
And when we introduce a new size (which should happen rarely), we add a
new entry to the switch using the normal _IO* macros, and either
rename the struct, or use offsetofend in the _IO* entry for the old one.
Just in XFS which I remember in detail we've done that to extend
structures in backwards compatible ways multiple times.
