On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 07:37 +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 08.07.25 22:10, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > diff --git a/fs/hfs/bfind.c b/fs/hfs/bfind.c > > index ef9498a6e88a..44a8b3ba4300 100644 > > --- a/fs/hfs/bfind.c > > +++ b/fs/hfs/bfind.c > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int hfs_find_init(struct hfs_btree *tree, struct hfs_find_data *fd) > > return -ENOMEM; > > fd->search_key = ptr; > > fd->key = ptr + tree->max_key_len + 2; > > - hfs_dbg(BNODE_REFS, "find_init: %d (%p)\n", > > + hfs_dbg("find_init: %d (%p)\n", > > tree->cnid, __builtin_return_address(0)); > > switch (tree->cnid) { > > case HFS_CAT_CNID: > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void hfs_find_exit(struct hfs_find_data *fd) > > { > > hfs_bnode_put(fd->bnode); > > kfree(fd->search_key); > > - hfs_dbg(BNODE_REFS, "find_exit: %d (%p)\n", > > + hfs_dbg("find_exit: %d (%p)\n", > > fd->tree->cnid, __builtin_return_address(0)); > > mutex_unlock(&fd->tree->tree_lock); > > fd->tree = NULL; > > The function name prefix isn't needed either with dynamic debug. > > echo 'func hfs_find_exit +pf' > /proc/dynamic_debug/control > > will add it Yeah, it's true. There are several other similar places. I did small corrections there. But I agree that it makes sense to rework it. Thanks, Slava.