Re: [PATCH] fuse: show io_uring mount option in /proc/mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/9/25 04:02, leo.lilong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Long Li <leo.lilong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When mounting a FUSE filesystem with io_uring option and using io_uring
> for communication, this option was not shown in /proc/mounts or mount
> command output. This made it difficult for users to verify whether
> io_uring was being used for communication in their FUSE mounts.
> 
> Add io_uring to the list of mount options displayed in fuse_show_options()
> when the fuse-over-io_uring feature is enabled and being used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index ecb869e895ab..a6a8cd84fdde 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int fuse_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
>  			seq_puts(m, ",default_permissions");
>  		if (fc->allow_other)
>  			seq_puts(m, ",allow_other");
> +		if (fc->io_uring)
> +			seq_puts(m, ",io_uring");
>  		if (fc->max_read != ~0)
>  			seq_printf(m, ",max_read=%u", fc->max_read);
>  		if (sb->s_bdev && sb->s_blocksize != FUSE_DEFAULT_BLKSIZE)

I agree with you that is impossible to see, but issue is that io_uring
is not a mount option. Maybe we should add a sysfs file?

Thanks,
Bernd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux