On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 at 02:01, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * both vfs_create_mount() and clone_mnt() add mount to the tail > of ->s_mounts. Is there any reason why that would be better than adding > to head? I don't remember if that had been covered back in 2010/2011 > discussion of per-mount r/o patchset; quick search on lore hasn't turned > up anything... Miklos? I don't see why it would matter. And I tend to choose tail if it doesn't matter. Thanks, Miklos
