On 7/2/25 3:23 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > Making anonymous inodes regular files comes with a lot of risk and > regression potential as evidenced by a recent hickup in io_uring. We're > better of continuing to not have them be regular files. Since we have > S_ANON_INODE we can port all of our assertions easily. Looks good to me and eases my worries on the S_IFREG addition. Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> -- Jens Axboe
