On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 08:12, Chen Linxuan <chenlinxuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my opinion, adding relevant directories and nodes under procfs does not seem > to be much different from what I did in this patch by adding nodes > under /sys/fs/fuse. > This kind of solution would still be a somewhat “non-generic” approach. > For io_uring, scm_rights, and fuse backing files, > these newly added files or directories will eventually have their own > specific names. Why? Name the attribute "hidden_files" and then it's generic. The underlying problem is the overgrowth of fdinfo files. It was never meant to contain arrays, let alone hierarchies. Thanks, Miklos
