On 6/23/25 16:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 6/23/25 16:08, Shivank Garg wrote: >> >> >>> >>> In general, LGTM, but I think the actual fix should be separated from exporting it for guest_memfd purposes? >>> >>> Also makes backporting easier, when EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES does not exist yet ... >>> >> I agree. I did not think about backporting conflicts when sending the patch. >> >> Christian, I can send it as 2 separate patches to make it easier? > > The proper way is to send the fix without the export, and then add the > export only when adding its user. Note: AFAIU either way the new user would be depending on a patch in a vfs tree (maybe scheduled for an 6.16 rc and not the next merge window?) if that's an issue for the development. >> Thanks, >> Shivank >
