Re: [PATCH 00/10] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025/6/17 0:59, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Christian,
> 
>>> This looks OK to me as long as the fs folks agree on the fallocate()
>>> semantics.
>>
>> That looks overall fine. Should I queue this up in the vfs tree?
> 
> We're expecting another revision addressing the queue limit sysfs
> override. Otherwise I believe it's good to go.
> 

Yeah, I'm going to revise the queue limits sysfs interface as
Christoph and Darrick suggested and send out v2.

Best regards,
Yi.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux