Re: [PATCH 1/8] simple_recursive_removal(): saner interaction with fsnotify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 07:02:23AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Make it match the real unlink(2)/rmdir(2) - notify *after* the
> operation.  And use fsnotify_delete() instead of messing with
> fsnotify_unlink()/fsnotify_rmdir().
> 
> Currently the only caller that cares is the one in debugfs, and
> there the order matching the normal syscalls makes more sense;
> it'll get more serious for users introduced later in the series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux