Hi! I'm trying to update the VFS documentation and docstrings about the non-existent i_mutex. Not sure if the distinction between shared and exclusive usage of i_rwsem is clear and correct across all the changes though. For instance, does __d_move expect the two i_rwsem to be held exclusively? It seems to me __d_unalias only uses inode_trylock_shared on the first argument to __d_move. Thanks, Junxuan Junxuan Liao (1): docs/vfs: update references to i_mutex to i_rwsem Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 2 +- fs/attr.c | 10 +++++----- fs/buffer.c | 2 +- fs/dcache.c | 4 ++-- fs/direct-io.c | 8 ++++---- fs/inode.c | 9 ++++----- fs/libfs.c | 5 +++-- fs/locks.c | 2 +- fs/namei.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- fs/namespace.c | 2 +- fs/stack.c | 4 ++-- fs/xattr.c | 2 +- include/linux/exportfs.h | 4 ++-- include/linux/fs.h | 6 +++--- include/linux/fs_stack.h | 2 +- include/linux/quotaops.h | 2 +- 16 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) base-commit: 381011d6ae29857c35cbcd8a4ec6594484ecfc84 -- 2.49.0
