Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] fuse: use iomap for buffered writes + writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> My main concern was whether iomap overhead ends up slowing down writes
> that don't need granular dirty tracking. I didn't see any noticeable
> difference in performance though when I tested it out by writing out
> all entire chunks.
>
Hi Joanne,

Sorry I couldn't get to this any earlier. But FWIW, I tried this
scenario as well (writes that don’t require fine-grained dirty
tracking). Like you mentioned, I also didn’t observe any performance
drop with the patchset applied.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux