On Thu 12-06-25 10:41:01, Luis Henriques wrote: > The assert in function file_seek_cur_needs_f_lock() can be triggered very > easily because, as Jan Kara suggested, the file reference may get > incremented after checking it with fdget_pos(). > > Fixes: da06e3c51794 ("fs: don't needlessly acquire f_lock") > Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > Hi Christian, > > It wasn't clear whether you'd be queueing this fix yourself. Since I don't > see it on vfs.git, I decided to explicitly send the patch so that it doesn't > slip through the cracks. > > Cheers, > -- > Luis > > fs/file.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c > index 3a3146664cf3..075f07bdc977 100644 > --- a/fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/file.c > @@ -1198,8 +1198,6 @@ bool file_seek_cur_needs_f_lock(struct file *file) > if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_ATOMIC_POS) && !file->f_op->iterate_shared) > return false; > > - VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE((file_count(file) > 1) && > - !mutex_is_locked(&file->f_pos_lock)); > return true; > } > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR