Re: [PATCH 2/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:48:02AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:33:52PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Add a new filemap_get_folios_dirty() helper to look up existing dirty
> > folios in a range and add them to a folio_batch. This is to support
> > optimization of certain iomap operations that only care about dirty
> > folios in a target range. For example, zero range only zeroes the subset
> > of dirty pages over unwritten mappings, seek hole/data may use similar
> > logic in the future, etc.
> > 
> > Note that the helper is intended for use under internal fs locks.
> > Therefore it trylocks folios in order to filter out clean folios.
> > This loosely follows the logic from filemap_range_has_writeback().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> You might want to cc willy directly on this one... 

Er yeah, I'll do that for v2.

> > ---
> >  include/linux/pagemap.h |  2 ++
> >  mm/filemap.c            | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > 
...
> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index bada249b9fb7..d28e984cdfd4 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -2334,6 +2334,48 @@ unsigned filemap_get_folios_tag(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t *start,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_get_folios_tag);
> >  
> > +unsigned filemap_get_folios_dirty(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t *start,
> > +			pgoff_t end, struct folio_batch *fbatch)
> 
> This ought to have a comment explaining what the function does.
> It identifies every folio starting at @*start and ending before @end
> that is dirty and tries to assign them to @fbatch, right?
> 

Yep, or at least every folio that starts before end. I'll add a comment
and incorporate all the followup feedback. Thanks.

Brian

> The code looks reasonable to me; hopefully there aren't some subtleties
> that I'm missing here :P
> 
> > +{
> > +	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, *start);
> > +	struct folio *folio;
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	while ((folio = find_get_entry(&xas, end, XA_PRESENT)) != NULL) {
> > +		if (xa_is_value(folio))
> > +			continue;
> > +		if (folio_trylock(folio)) {
> > +			bool clean = !folio_test_dirty(folio) &&
> > +				     !folio_test_writeback(folio);
> > +			folio_unlock(folio);
> > +			if (clean) {
> > +				folio_put(folio);
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +		if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio)) {
> > +			unsigned long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> > +			*start = folio->index + nr;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We come here when there is no page beyond @end. We take care to not
> 
> ...no folio beyond @end?
> 
> --D
> 
> > +	 * overflow the index @start as it confuses some of the callers. This
> > +	 * breaks the iteration when there is a page at index -1 but that is
> > +	 * already broke anyway.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (end == (pgoff_t)-1)
> > +		*start = (pgoff_t)-1;
> > +	else
> > +		*start = end + 1;
> > +out:
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > +	return folio_batch_count(fbatch);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_get_folios_dirty);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * CD/DVDs are error prone. When a medium error occurs, the driver may fail
> >   * a _large_ part of the i/o request. Imagine the worst scenario:
> > -- 
> > 2.49.0
> > 
> > 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux