Re: [HFS] generic/740 failure details

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 2025-06-09 at 19:41 +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> Frankly speaking, I don't see the point to re-write the hfs-progs in Rust for
> multiple reasons:
> (1) mostly, the main use-case that HFS/HFS+ partition is created under Mac OS
> and somebody tries to mount it under Linux to access data;
> (2) Apple is the owner of the code on Mac OS side and it's not good to
> significantly deviate from the Apple's state of the code;
> (3) I believe that Apple considers hfs-progs as obsolete code and they don't
> want any significant changes in it;
> (4) the hfs-progs is user-space tool, it is not frequently used, and even it
> fails, then there is no much harm.

Writing hfsprogs from scratch for Linux would mean though that a proper license
could be chosen that is not APSL which some distributions consider non-free.

On the other hands, the current hfsprogs utility is based on Apple's original
HFS/HFS+ code which is battle-tested and known to be reliable and robust. I'm
not sure whether we would be able to reach this level of stability within a
reasonable amount of time.

I do have to resume my work on my Linux patches again so that we can synchronize
hfsprogs with the latest upstream version.


Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux