Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc/task_mmu: add VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when support GCS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.06.25 15:15, wangfushuai wrote:
The recent commit adding VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 GCS did not update
the /proc/[pid]/smaps display logic to show the "ss" flag for GCS pages.
This patch adds the necessary condition to display "ss" flag.

Fixes: ae80e1629aea ("mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS")
Signed-off-by: wangfushuai <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 27972c0749e7..2c2ee893a797 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -994,6 +994,9 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
  		[ilog2(VM_SHADOW_STACK)] = "ss",
  #endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_GCS)
+		[ilog2(VM_SHADOW_STACK)] = "ss",
+#endif

Which makes me wonder why we don't select CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK for CONFIG_ARM64_GCS?

  #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
  		[ilog2(VM_DROPPABLE)] = "dp",
  #endif


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux