Re: [PATCH] xarray: Add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 28/05/25 10:42 pm, Zi Yan wrote:
On 28 May 2025, at 7:31, Dev Jain wrote:

Suppose xas is pointing somewhere near the end of the multi-entry batch.
Then it may happen that the computed slot already falls beyond the batch,
thus breaking the loop due to !xa_is_sibling(), and computing the wrong
order. Thus ensure that the caller is aware of this by triggering a BUG
when the entry is a sibling entry.
Is it possible to add a test case in lib/test_xarray.c for this?
You can compile the tests with “make -C tools/testing/radix-tree”
and run “./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray”.


Sorry forgot to Cc you.
I can surely do that later, but does this patch look fine?



This patch is motivated by code inspection and not a real bug report.

Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>
---
The patch applies on 6.15 kernel.

  lib/xarray.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c
index 9644b18af18d..0f699766c24f 100644
--- a/lib/xarray.c
+++ b/lib/xarray.c
@@ -1917,6 +1917,8 @@ int xas_get_order(struct xa_state *xas)
  	if (!xas->xa_node)
  		return 0;

+	XA_NODE_BUG_ON(xas->xa_node, xa_is_sibling(xa_entry(xas->xa,
+		       xas->xa_node, xas->xa_offset)));
  	for (;;) {
  		unsigned int slot = xas->xa_offset + (1 << order);

--
2.30.2

Best Regards,
Yan, Zi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux