On Wed May 28, 2025 at 2:33 AM PDT, Malte Schröder wrote: > On 28/05/2025 11:00, Christopher Snowhill wrote: >> On Tue May 27, 2025 at 11:52 AM PDT, John Stoffel wrote: >>>>>>>> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> There was a feature request I forgot to mention - New option, >>>> 'rebalance_on_ac_only'. Does exactly what the name suggests, quite >>>> handy with background compression. >>> LOL, only if you know what the _ac_ part stands for. :-) >> Would you have suggested perhaps _mains_ ? That may have rang better >> with some folks. I suppose, at least. >> > What about 'no_rebalance_on_battery'? Oh, awesome suggestion. A little inversion of language, so battery is front and center, and we avoid having to think of a billion different terms for line power. What say anyone else? > > /Malte
