Re: [BUG] regression from 974c5e6139db "xfs: flag as supporting FOP_DONTCACHE" (double free on page?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:58:47PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/26/25 5:56 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 11:38:53AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> I'll poke a bit more...
> >>
> >> I _think_ we're racing with the same folio being marked for writeback
> >> again. Al, can you try the below?
> > 
> > It seems to survive on top of v6.15^^
> 
> Thanks for testing, Al! Assuming it goes without saying, but that's 6.15
> with 478ad02d6844 reverted, right?

That's 6.15 without two last commits - 478ad02d6844 and the version bump ;-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux